0নার্ভ একটি খেলা?

সেই সময় আবার - রাত দীর্ঘ, বায়ু ঠান্ডা, কিন্তু শীঘ্রই রেডিও জীবনে আগুন ও আমাদের কান অস্ট্রেলিয়ার গ্রীষ্মের শব্দসমূহ আনব. ইংল্যান্ড একটি জয় আগের হোয়াইটওয়াশ থেকে ফিরে আসবে (তারা করেনি 2010-11, অথবা অস্ট্রেলিয়া সম্পন্ন হবে 3^rd মধ্যে হোয়াইটওয়াশের 4 ক্রম. আমি এক টা পণ জন্য এটি ড্র হবে না!

I think this is the hard­est to pre­dict Ashes series this mil­len­ni­um — both sides have a decent num­ber of qual­ity bowl­ers, এবং সমানভাবে ভাগ 4 of the best bats­men in the game. Both sides also have a recent his­tory of middle order col­lapse, and a selec­tion of match res­ults that vary from bril­liant to truly pathet­ic. It seems like it might be a case of “who cracks first”.

If Eng­land get on top, তারা করেনি 2010, the Aus­sie crowds and press will get at the green-team with a vigour only nor­mally seen in the Brit­ish press when the foot­ballers fail to mater­i­al­ise. সমানভাবে, if Aus­tralia get on top then Eng­land have a tend­ency to totally implode as they did in the 2 vis­its down under either side of their 2010 বিজয়.

Over­all the odds must be in the Aus­trali­an’s favour, some­thing the book­ies agree with. They have home-soil advant­age and will no doubt pre­pare pitches that offer pace and seam with as little swing as pos­sible. Fair play to them — I’ve no doubt Eng­land will pre­pare swinging pitches in return the next time our Aus­sie friends are over here. বেন স্টোকস ব্যাপার (1) has also dam­aged England’s pre­par­a­tions, and there are some injury prob­lems which could prove sig­ni­fic­ant too.

I think the mar­gins between the teams are quite small, and things bey­ond human con­trol (e.g. শিরসঁচালন, the weath­er) could prove cru­cial. আমিও মনে করি একবার একটি দল উপরে পায় একটি ভাল সুযোগ আছে তারা সেখানে থাকবে যে. The dif­fer­ence between a 3–1 vic­tory as in 2010, and a 5–0 defeat, could actu­ally be quite small. If Eng­land come away with a draw, তারা অ্যাশেজ ধরে রাখা হবে. This will rightly be regarded as pretty much as good as vic­tory and Eng­land will rightly get all the plaudits. Plan­ning for vic­tory should­n’t be the hard­est job in the world, so instead — how about we think before­hand about what might hap­pen in the event of defeat.

Let’s ima­gine the Aus­sies get a bit of run of the ball, এবং এটি ভাল ব্যবহার করতে, and Eng­land sink to defeat in the first couple of test matches. Real­ist­ic­ally it is unlikely that they could come back from 2–0 down, so the remain­ing matches would­n’t really tell us a great deal new. Is there a dif­fer­ence between leav­ing hav­ing lost by 3 অথবা 4 দলের অক্ষত সঙ্গে, and leav­ing hav­ing lost 5–0 with the cap­tain in doubt, a lead­ing bowl­er gone, এবং 2 of the best bats­man gone. I ask because that is what happened in 2013–14, when ques­tions were left hanging over Cap­tain Cook, Jonath­an Trott quit inter­na­tion­al crick­et, কেপি কেনার পর, ও গ্রায়েম সোয়ান মধ্য সফর প্রস্থান. In oth­er words massive mis­man­age­ment had man­aged to snatch a much great­er defeat from the jaws of a brief embar­rass­ment. Just ima­gine the cur­rent Eng­land team but with KP, Trott and Swann still avail­able for selec­tion — a world num­ber 1 পাশ নিশ্চয়?

Instead we have a young­er less exper­i­enced team, but with plenty of qual­ity and plenty of poten­tial. It is essen­tial to the future of the team that such massive fail­ures of man­age­ment are not repeated on this tour. There is no dom­in­ant coun­try in test crick­et at present, with Aus­tralia, ইংল্যান্ড, ভারত, Pakistan and South Africa all cap­able of being dom­in­ant and ruth­less, and also all cap­able of being very poor too. There is noth­ing to sep­ar­ate these 5 পক্ষই. All of them would be favour­ites in home con­di­tions to beat all of the oth­ers. This is par­tic­u­larly so in England’s case, সঙ্গে 2 of the best swing bowl­ers in the his­tory of the game able to win home matches with reg­u­lar­ity, even when the bats­men are struggling.

সুতরাং, let’s hope the Eng­land man­age­ment have learned from pre­vi­ous mis­takes, এবং পরাজয়ের ঘটনা, find ways to keep the team togeth­er, lift the great tal­ent we have, and bring the Eng­land team home ready to con­tin­ue build­ing towards the future. If they can­’t do that, ঠিক কি তারা দলের জন্য কি করবেন?

(1) A foot­note on the Ben Stokes affair. This is a wor­ry­ing sign that Eng­land man­age­ment haven’t learned from the past. Ask your­self this — if it was the oth­er way around and a key Aus­sie play­er had assaul­ted someone in a bar would the Aus­sies have dropped that play­er? Or would they have down­played it, picked the guy any­way, and even gone on to make him vice cap­tain? আপনি উত্তর সম্পর্কে কোনো সন্দেহ থাকে, শুধু জো রুট জিজ্ঞাসা! It seems to me that Eng­land man­age­ment are first and fore­most inter­ested in avoid­ing catch­ing any flack from the media, rather than act­ing in the right way. Suc­cess­ful man­age­ment pub­licly sup­ports their play­er. What is said in private is no doubt very dif­fer­ent. There isn’t even any sign of man­age­ment tak­ing a grain of respons­ib­il­ity, des­pite repeated fail­ures to man­age play­ers effect­ively, be it with men­tal health (ট্রেসকোথিক, ট্রট), team rela­tions (সোয়ান, কেপি), or respons­ible beha­viour (Flintoff in ped­alo-gate, Root get­ting punched in walk­about, play­ers urin­at­ing on the pitch, এবং এখন উত্তেজনা আউট স্টোকস).