Eerstens 'n verskoning dat ek die webwerf nie veel laat opgedateer het nie - saam met die ander outeur van hierdie webwerf was ek op reis deur Europa.
Ons is nou al terug, so bang nie.
so, Engeland het op die laaste dag die as met 'n opwindende vertoning van die as toegedraai om hulle goed te pak en waarlik pak toe te stuur. Daar is al baie geskryf oor Engeland se optrede en, in die besonder, Stuart Broad se opvoering. Dit was uitstekend, einde van.
Dus gaan ek konsentreer op iets anders, 'n bietjie off-sentrum as jy wil.
Toe Australië 'n paar jaar terug op hul hoogtepunt was (lyk so lank gelede nou!) the one mistake they made was not to blood up-and-coming youngsters so they had a chance to experience the highs and lows of test match cricket.
Their side always picked itself and they stuck to an oft-quoted principal of not changing a winning side (fair enough). But when the golden generation decided to call it quits the dearth of experienced talent was immediately available.
England now are in a position of strength. Whilst it would be great to beat the Aussies 4–0 we have won the Ashes and won them comfortably. There is no argument – we are a far better team than they are.
Now would be the perfect time to test a few youngsters in what will still be a competitive game (the Aussies still have sommige trots om te speel vir) in 'n geen-verloor situasie.
I’m not saying we should tear up the team sheet and start again but there’s no harm with testing a few lads.
Firstly I think we should look at who is going to be our next spinner. Monty Panesar has seemingly had a melt down and Simon Kerrigan has leapt above him in the pecking order. Graeme Swann has been England’s best spin-bowler for years but he isn’t going to be around for ever and can be prone to the odd knock. Kerrigan should start.
Tim Bresnan het goed gespeel, maar is nou beseer. Woakes and Onions have been called with one of them likely to take his place unless England break a time-honoured position and pick two spinners at the Oval. Personally I’m not that sure about Woakes but if England see him as the future then let’s see what he’s made of.
One position that is rarely talked about these days is that of wicket keeper. That’s a massive vote of confidence in Matt Prior who has made the position his own. Maar wie is volgende? Are England looking to have Jonny Bairstow as his long-term successor? Or are they looking elsewhere? Hoe dit ook al sou dit 'n idee wees om hul tweede opsie in die toets-wedstryd arena te toets.
So dit is drie veranderinge reeds. Now what about the batting line-up? Wel, Bell opsy, die top-orde het grootliks misluk om te skyn, getting starts but not converting them and not batting in partnerships. Despite this the top order, with the possible exception of Bairstow, will pick itself for the next instalment of the Ashes but there’s no harm in seeing what others have to offer. Taylor is clearly in the selectors’ thoughts but two Yorkshire lads –Gary Ballance (who hit a century for the England Lions vs the Aussies) is there or thereabouts as is fellow Yorkie, 20 jarige Alex Read. One of the three should be considered with any of the current batsmen (Bell en Cook opsy) having a rest.
Revolutionary stuff I know, and we do run the risk of losing the last match, but wouldn’t it be even sweeter if we still tonked them with four first-teamers out.
As 'n eenkant sal jy trots op hierdie twee outeurs wees. When in Venice on our European adventure we got into conversation with two young Australian ladies. Despite their background we both managed to avoid the burning temptation to mention the cricket. Goue ster vir ons!
so, looks like the selectors are reading our posts. Woakes and Kerrigan both picked. Unfortunately I have to agree with Lord Boycott that it was the wrong decision. I agree with your sentiment in principle but I think they’ve done it the wrong way.
Firstly I’d suggest trying players against weaker sides generally — not letting the Aussie’s find some form just in time for the return series!
Next I think Geoffrey is right that it isn’t sensible to have 2 new bowlers at once in a 5‑man attack — there is too much pressure on them. I would have given Kerrigan a go, but I see Woakes as a specialist for limited overs, and would have picked Tremlett.
Introducing 4 new players at once is almost guaranteed to result in defeat which isn’t good for young players confidence and attitude! Better to bring them in 1 at a time to a successful side.
I would have played: kok, wortel, Trott, Pieterson, klok, Prior, Broad, Swann, Anderson, Tremlett, Kerrigan with Lees as 12ste man.
I’d argue Root is still new enough that now isn’t the time to try another batsman, but getting 1 of 2 into the squad seems a good idea.