সুতরাং, কুচুটে 1St ট্রেন্ট ব্রিজের অ্যাশেজ টেস্টটি এখনও চমকপ্রদ হতে চলেছে যার সাথে এখনও স্পষ্ট কোন বিজয়ী উদয় হয়নি। তবে আমি গেমের সম্ভাব্য মূল মুহূর্তের দিকে ফিরে তাকাতে চাই - অস্ট্রেলিয়ার আগরকে দেওয়া "অপরাজিত" সিদ্ধান্ত। আমাকে পরিষ্কার করে দেওয়া যাক - কোনও ডিআরএস সিস্টেম এবং আম্পায়ার এটি পরিচালনা করে - কোনও খেলোয়াড় বা অন-ফিল্ড আম্পায়ারদের উপর কোনও ত্রুটি রাখা যায় না। এই টেস্ট ম্যাচে এবং সাম্প্রতিক চ্যাম্পিয়ন ট্রফিতে বেশ কয়েকটি ভুল সিদ্ধান্ত নেওয়া হয়েছে, ঘুরে তাদের প্রতিটি তাকান দেয়.
সুতরাং, lets list the really poor decisions involving England so far this summer, এবং তারপর ঘুরে প্রতিটি সঙ্গে মোকাবেলা
1. অ্যাস্টন অ্যাগার, given not out when stumped (England vs Australia, প্রথম টেস্ট, দ্বিতীয় দিন)
Agar was stumped by Matt Prior. The on-field umpire called for a 3rd umpire decision as it was too close to call. The pictures clearly showed the foot was ON the line. To be given not out the foot must be behind the line. Whilst benefit of the doubt goes to the batsman, there was no doubt that Agar did not have his foot behind the line. I find it utterly inexplicable that he was given not out — I think the third umpire should explain what he saw and why he decided to give the decision not out. A video is also available on YouTube, but sadly neither the video nor the following still image are in HD format. If you know of an HD source please let us know.
2. জনাথন ট্রট, given out এলবিডব্লুর শিকার after hitting the ball (England vs Australia, প্রথম টেস্ট, দ্বিতীয় দিন)
তৃতীয় আম্পায়ার থেকে পরিষ্কার করা, this decision was wrong due to a failure of the DRS system. Trott was given not out by the on-field umpire but the decision was refered by the Australians. The third umpire gave Trott out as there was no hot-spot evidence that he had hit the ball. However, the crucial side-on hot-spot camera view was not available thanks to Sky using the camera to replay a previous ball. It is fair to say we’ll be writing more about this disgrace in the near future. The third umpire should have told the on-field umpire that he had couldn’t see all of the hot-spot pictures and the proper decision should have been to give the batsman OR the on-field umpire the benefit of the doubt — in either case Trott would have remained not out. দী 2 images below clearly show that the ball has moved to the right before hitting the pad, and there is a small mark on snickometer from the impact with the bat in the first image (এটি দেখতে হলে পূর্ণ আকার স্পষ্ট দেখতে).
3. স্টুয়ার্ট ব্রড, given not out caught after edging the ball (England vs Australia, প্রথম টেস্ট, Day 3)
ঠিক আছে, this one isn’t a fault of the third umpire — it was a genuine mistake by the on-field umpire which would doubtless have been corrected by the third umpire had it been reviewed. It was a very poor on-field decision but the umpire may have been confused by an almost immediate second deflection off the edge of the wicket keepers gloves. Australia were unable to review the decision as they had already wasted both of their reviews earlier in the day. The Australians need to learn to use reviews properly — the review system was introduced to challenge “howlers” like this. Some pundits have also put forward the view the Broad should have walked — we’ll discuss that another time. A clear video of the incident is available on YouTube.
4. ইয়ান বেল, given out stumped with his foot behind the line (ইঞ্জিনিয়ার ভারত বনাম, Champions Trophy final)
A crucial decision which most likely cost England victory in the Champions Trophy final against India. Bell was given out when the cameras clearly showed his foot was behind the line and grounded.
We’ll try to find high quality images of each of the decisions so you can judge for yourself
“লাল / সবুজ ঘাটতি দৃষ্টিতে গোলাপী বলটি ধূসর / নীল প্রদর্শিত হয়, এর তীব্রতার উপর নির্ভর করে. রঙ অন্ধ হয়ে একটি সিমুলেশন করেছি ulation…”