ಆದ್ದರಿಂದ, ಮಳೆ ನೆನೆಸಿದ ಡ್ರಾ ಕಡೆಗೆ ಅಂತಿಮ ಪರೀಕ್ಷೆಯ ಮುಖ್ಯಸ್ಥರು ಪಂಡಿತರು ಹರಟೆ ಹೊಡೆಯಲು ಏನನ್ನಾದರೂ ಹುಡುಕುತ್ತಿದ್ದಾರೆ. ಅವರು ಅಂತಿಮವಾಗಿ ಡಿಆರ್ಎಸ್ ವ್ಯವಸ್ಥೆಯಲ್ಲಿ ಪಾಪ್ಸ್ ತೆಗೆದುಕೊಳ್ಳುವಲ್ಲಿ ಬೇಸರಗೊಂಡಿದ್ದಾರೆಂದು ತೋರುತ್ತದೆ, ಮತ್ತು ಅವರು ಕೆಳಗಿರುವಾಗ ತಂಡವನ್ನು ಒದೆಯುವುದು ಕ್ರಿಕೆಟ್ ಅಲ್ಲ (ಅದೆಂದರೆ. ಆಸ್ಟ್ರೇಲಿಯಾ) ಆದ್ದರಿಂದ ಅನಿವಾರ್ಯವಾಗಿ ಗಮನವು ಇಂಗ್ಲೆಂಡ್ ಕಡೆಗೆ ತಿರುಗಿದೆ. ಸರಣಿಯನ್ನು 3–0ರಿಂದ ಗೆದ್ದಂತೆ ತೋರುತ್ತದೆ (ಸುಮಾರು 30 ಗಂಟೆಗಳ ಸಮಯದಲ್ಲಿ ದೃ confirmed ೀಕರಿಸಲ್ಪಡುತ್ತದೆ) ಮತ್ತು ಗೆಲ್ಲುವುದು 3 ಟ್ರೊಟ್ನಲ್ಲಿನ ಚಿತಾಭಸ್ಮ ಸರಣಿಯು ಇಂಗ್ಲೆಂಡ್ "ಆವೇಗವನ್ನು ಕಳೆದುಕೊಳ್ಳುತ್ತಿದೆ" ಎಂಬುದರ ಸಂಕೇತವಾಗಿದೆ. ಏನು ಅಸಂಬದ್ಧ.
The primary reason for all the negativity is the pace of England’s scoring in the 5ನೇ test — at an “unacceptable” 2 per over. Predictably the pundits haven’t actually said what England should be doing! Perhaps we should be aiming for 3.5 runs per over and ending up all out with time for the Aussies to win, although it would seem to me that really would be handing the momentum to Australia. On the contrary — England are doing exactly what many of the pundits have been calling for them to do for ages — playing the pitch, conditions and bowling that is presented to them. When the poor ball came it was dispatched. What the pundits aren’t being honest enough to say clearly is that England are playing for a draw. Why would they do that? ಸರಿ, perhaps because on a slow pitch, with lots of rain forecast, and with the opposition having nearly 500 on the board after 2 days, winning is vanishingly likely.Could England have won?Assuming the forecast is correct and most of today will be lost to rain, how might England have won the match? Let’s very optimistically assume we could bowl the Australians out in 2 sessions. Assuming the Aussies scored at 3 an over they would be expected to make 180 in those 2 sessions. Add that to their first innings of 492 gives a total for England to get of 672. Nevermind that England haven’t reached 400 yet in this series — how long would be needed to get 672 at a very generous 4 ಪ್ರತಿ ಓವರ್ಗೆ ಗಳಿಸುವ ಓಟಗಳು? The answer — 168 overs. So, that would be the 18 ದಿನ ಓವರ್ಗಳಲ್ಲಿ 2, ಎಲ್ಲಾ 90 overs yesterday, 30 ಓವರ್ಗಳಲ್ಲಿ ಇಂದು (the best we can hope for according to the weather) ಮತ್ತು 30 ಓವರ್ಗಳಲ್ಲಿ tomorrow.So, if you believe the England could bat over 4 days, ಫಾರ್ 168 ಓವರ್ಗಳ, ನಲ್ಲಿ 4 ಪ್ರತಿ ಓವರ್ಗೆ ಗಳಿಸುವ ಓಟಗಳು, and then bowl Australia out for 180 in 60 ಓವರ್ಗಳ, you can conclude England had a chance of winning. Otherwise (ನನ್ನ ಥರ) you can confidently conclude England didn’t have enough time in the match to secure victory and that the most sensible thing to do was to prevent Australia taking anything away from the series, and to take the opportunity for the England batsmen to try to bat themselves into some form.
An additional bonus for England is that after 1 decent innings together Australia now feel like they have a settled batting line up: a line up that doesn’t convince me at all. Steve Smith isn’t good enough to get into any good test side. Shane Watson has once again delivered when it doesn’t matter and continues to look very vulnerable to ಎಲ್ಬಿಡಬ್ಲ್ಯೂ. Michael Clarke is still a class batsman but England have got his number — he struggles against Stuart Broad and the short ball in particular and he hasn’t even had a chance to face Tremlett who is likely to feature in the return series. Rogers is a decent player but I can’t see him making many “game changing” scores which leaves the incident prone Warner who is again a decent batsman but thanks to his style he tends to give chances. Rogers & Warner doesn’t exactly have the same ring as Hayden & Langer does itWhen all is said and done this England side have beaten better Australian teams already and have batsmen due back into form. England are rightly sending a message to Australia — give us half a chance and we’ll beat you. Play really well and we’re strong enough to hold you off. Go home with nothing from this series and look forward to seeing us again in 3 ತಿಂಗಳ.
“ಗುಲಾಬಿ ಚೆಂಡು ಕೆಂಪು / ಹಸಿರು ಕೊರತೆಯ ದೃಷ್ಟಿಯಲ್ಲಿ ಬೂದು / ನೀಲಿ ಬಣ್ಣದಲ್ಲಿ ಕಾಣುತ್ತದೆ, ಅದರ ತೀವ್ರತೆಯನ್ನು ಅವಲಂಬಿಸಿರುತ್ತದೆ. ನಾನು ಬಣ್ಣ ಕುರುಡುತನದಿಂದ ಸಿಮ್ಯುಲೇಶನ್ ಮಾಡಿದ್ದೇನೆ…”