1خاڪ urnنوڪري ٿي وئي - انگلينڊ هڪ 2-0 جي اڳواڻي ورتي

ڪم ٿي ويو. آسٽريليا ک thrي ڇڏيو.

انهن کي اصل ۾ روٽ جي گڏيل هيروئينٽس جو جواب نه هو (وڏي صدي ۽ ڏي of ليٽ وڪيٽون), بيل (هڪ تمام اهم پهرين اننگز ٽون جهڙي ٻئي اڌ ۾ مهذب اڌ صدي (باقي هن ​​کي ٻاهر ٿي ويا آهن گهرجي, پڪڙجي, 20-جوڙ تي) ۽ Swann (9 وڪيٽن). جڏهن انهن جو ٻيو بهترين رانديگر پليجي لاءِ پريشان ٿيو آهي, واٽسسن, ڇا هن جي ٽيڪنڪ انگلينڊ جي حملي کي وڏي طريقي سان ظاهر ڪري رهيو آهي - هو اڃا تائين هڪ هو LBW vic­tim today.

What is even more wor­ry­ing for the Aus­trali­ans is that most of the Eng­land side haven’t even third gear yet. Eng­land are a fair bit off their best and have a lot more left in reserve. Yet they are still win­ning. They should have won the first test com­fort­ably and thrashed Aus­tralia in this match. اها ڳالهه اتي هاڻي هڪ وقفو جي سا آهي هڪ شرم آهي.

As ever look­ing for­ward to the next test.

جواب ڇڏي وڃو

هڪ جو رايو آهي

JSJon Scaife

You say (as did quite a few pun­dits on TMS) that Bell should have been giv­en out for the catch — but have you watched it? I totally dis­agree with the pun­dits on TMS — the pic­ture looks pretty clearly like the ball hits the ground to me. I hate to link to the Daily Mail, but they have a clear image of it. As far as I’m con­cerned the ball is in con­tact with the ground — there is no room for a fin­ger under­neath it. He may also have his hands around it, but if its made con­tact with the ground at all then it can­’t be out. If there is “doubt” — and there is more than suf­fi­cient grounds for doubt, then the bene­fit must go to the bats­man. Not­ably the com­menters on the page I linked all think the same as I do. The third umpire got this decision cor­rect. Not out.

جواب