त्यामुळे, उत्साही 1यष्टीचीत ट्रेंट ब्रिजवरील hesशेस कसोटी अद्याप उत्साहाने उद्भवू शकला नाही. तथापि मला खेळाच्या संभाव्य महत्त्वाच्या क्षणाकडे परत पहायचे आहे - ऑस्ट्रेलियाच्या आगरला दिलेला “नाबाद” निर्णय. मला स्पष्ट द्या - कोणत्याही डीआरएस सिस्टम आणि पंच व्यवस्थापित करणा .्या पंपांपैकी कोणत्याही खेळाडू किंवा मैदानावरील पंचांवर कोणताही दोष असू शकत नाही. या कसोटी सामन्यात आणि नुकत्याच झालेल्या चॅम्पियन्स ट्रॉफीमध्ये अनेक चुकीचे निर्णय घेण्यात आले आहेत, यामधून त्यांना प्रत्येक पाहू देते.
त्यामुळे, lets list the really poor decisions involving England so far this summer, आणि नंतर यामधून प्रत्येक सामोरे
1. ऍस्टोन ऍगर, given not out when stumped (England vs Australia, पहिल्या कसोटी, दिवस 2)
Agar was stumped by Matt Prior. The on-field umpire called for a 3व्या umpire decision as it was too close to call. The pictures clearly showed the foot was ON the line. To be given not out the foot must be behind the line. Whilst benefit of the doubt goes to the batsman, there was no doubt that Agar did not have his foot behind the line. I find it utterly inexplicable that he was given not out — I think the third umpire should explain what he saw and why he decided to give the decision not out. A video is also available on YouTube, but sadly neither the video nor the following still image are in HD format. If you know of an HD source please let us know.
2. जोनाथन ट्रॉट, given out पायचीत.एकही रन नाही after hitting the ball (England vs Australia, पहिल्या कसोटी, दिवस 2)
तिसरे पंच करण्यासाठी गोरा असेल, this decision was wrong due to a failure of the DRS system. Trott was given not out by the on-field umpire but the decision was refered by the Australians. The third umpire gave Trott out as there was no hot-spot evidence that he had hit the ball. However, the crucial side-on hot-spot camera view was not available thanks to Sky using the camera to replay a previous ball. It is fair to say we’ll be writing more about this disgrace in the near future. The third umpire should have told the on-field umpire that he had couldn’t see all of the hot-spot pictures and the proper decision should have been to give the batsman OR the on-field umpire the benefit of the doubt — in either case Trott would have remained not out. The 2 images below clearly show that the ball has moved to the right before hitting the pad, and there is a small mark on snickometer from the impact with the bat in the first image (स्पष्टपणे पाहण्यासाठी पूर्ण आकारात पाहण्यासाठी).
3. Stuart Broad, given not out caught after edging the ball (England vs Australia, पहिल्या कसोटी, Day 3)
ठीक आहे, this one isn’t a fault of the third umpire — it was a genuine mistake by the on-field umpire which would doubtless have been corrected by the third umpire had it been reviewed. It was a very poor on-field decision but the umpire may have been confused by an almost immediate second deflection off the edge of the wicket keepers gloves. Australia were unable to review the decision as they had already wasted both of their reviews earlier in the day. The Australians need to learn to use reviews properly — the review system was introduced to challenge “howlers” like this. Some pundits have also put forward the view the Broad should have walked — we’ll discuss that another time. A clear video of the incident is available on YouTube.
4. इयान बेल, given out stumped with his foot behind the line (भारत वि इंग्लंड, Champions Trophy final)
A crucial decision which most likely cost England victory in the Champions Trophy final against India. Bell was given out when the cameras clearly showed his foot was behind the line and grounded.
We’ll try to find high quality images of each of the decisions so you can judge for yourself
“लाल / हिरव्या रंगाच्या कमतरतेमुळे गुलाबी बॉल धूसर / निळा दिसतो, त्याच्या तीव्रतेवर अवलंबून. मी रंगाने अंधत्व असलेले एक नक्कल केले…”