Firstly an apology for not updating the site much of late – along with the other author for this site I’ve been on a drive through Europe.
We are back now though, so fear not.
So, England wrapped up the Ashes with a barnstorming performance on the last day to well and truly send them packing. A lot has been written already about England’s performance and, in particular, Stuart Broad’s performance. It was excellent, end of.
So I’m going to concentrate on something a little different, a little off-centre if you will.
When Australia were at their peak a few years back (seems so long ago now!) the one mistake they made was not to blood up-and-coming youngsters so they had a chance to experience the highs and lows of test match cricket.
Their side always picked itself and they stuck to an oft-quoted principal of not changing a winning side (fair enough). But when the golden generation decided to call it quits the dearth of experienced talent was immediately available.
England now are in a position of strength. Whilst it would be great to beat the Aussies 4–0 we have won the Ashes and won them comfortably. There is no argument – we are a far better team than they are.
Now would be the perfect time to test a few youngsters in what will still be a competitive game (the Aussies still have some pride to play for) in a no-lose situation.
I’m not saying we should tear up the team sheet and start again but there’s no harm with testing a few lads.
Firstly I think we should look at who is going to be our next spinner. Monty Panesar has seemingly had a melt down and Simon Kerrigan has leapt above him in the pecking order. Graeme Swann has been England’s best spin-bowler for years but he isn’t going to be around for ever and can be prone to the odd knock. Kerrigan should start.
Tim Bresnan has played well but is now injured. Woakes and Onions have been called with one of them likely to take his place unless England break a time-honoured position and pick two spinners at the Oval. Personally I’m not that sure about Woakes but if England see him as the future then let’s see what he’s made of.
One position that is rarely talked about these days is that of wicket keeper. That’s a massive vote of confidence in Matt Prior who has made the position his own. But who comes next? Are England looking to have Jonny Bairstow as his long-term successor? Or are they looking elsewhere? Either way it would be an idea to test their second option in the test-match arena.
So that’s three changes already. Now what about the batting line-up? Well, Bell aside, the top-order have largely failed to shine, getting starts but not converting them and not batting in partnerships. Despite this the top order, with the possible exception of Bairstow, will pick itself for the next instalment of the Ashes but there’s no harm in seeing what others have to offer. Taylor is clearly in the selectors’ thoughts but two Yorkshire lads –Gary Ballance (who hit a century for the England Lions vs the Aussies) is there or thereabouts as is fellow Yorkie, 20 year old Alex Lees. One of the three should be considered with any of the current batsmen (Bell and Cook aside) having a rest.
Revolutionary stuff I know, and we do run the risk of losing the last match, but wouldn’t it be even sweeter if we still tonked them with four first-teamers out.
As an aside you will be proud of these two authors. When in Venice on our European adventure we got into conversation with two young Australian ladies. Despite their background we both managed to avoid the burning temptation to mention the cricket. Gold star for us!
So, looks like the selectors are reading our posts. Woakes and Kerrigan both picked. Unfortunately I have to agree with Lord Boycott that it was the wrong decision. I agree with your sentiment in principle but I think they’ve done it the wrong way.
Firstly I’d suggest trying players against weaker sides generally — not letting the Aussie’s find some form just in time for the return series!
Next I think Geoffrey is right that it isn’t sensible to have 2 new bowlers at once in a 5‑man attack — there is too much pressure on them. I would have given Kerrigan a go, but I see Woakes as a specialist for limited overs, and would have picked Tremlett.
Introducing 4 new players at once is almost guaranteed to result in defeat which isn’t good for young players confidence and attitude! Better to bring them in 1 at a time to a successful side.
I would have played: Cook, Root, Trott, Pieterson, Bell, Prior, Broad, Swann, Anderson, Tremlett, Kerrigan with Lees as 12th man.
I’d argue Root is still new enough that now isn’t the time to try another batsman, but getting 1 or 2 into the squad seems a good idea.