0Die as urnHuistoestande - belangriker as ooit?

so, Engeland het die as omvattend toegedraai met 'n spel wat spaar. Wat 'n ommekeer van 18 maande gelede waar hulle deur 'n gemiddelde Australiese span verneder is. Met so 'n groot swaai-uitkoms oor die verlede 3 Asreeks het die praatkoppe gefokus op die toestande wat 'n groot rol speel. Is hulle reg om?

Soos dikwels die antwoord is nie 'n eenvoudige een. In the case of Eng­land and Aus­tralia, Ja, there is a very large ele­ment that the con­di­tions play — Eng­land have been hope­less and inept against the fast pitched boun­cing deliv­er­ies com­mon to Aus­tralia, and the much vaunted Aus­trali­an bats­men have been even more hope­less when facing the mov­ing ball. Is that all there is to crick­et though? What about oth­er test sides?

Well India have always been excel­lent at home and poor away from home, with con­di­tions there also play­ing a major part. Maar wat van Suid-Afrika, Pakistan, Nieu-Seeland, Sri Lanka, en die Wes-Indiese Eilande? All of these sides seem to be less influ­enced by con­di­tions — with South Africa being very suc­cess­ful every­where and the West Indies often struggling.

The prob­lem is far great­er for Eng­land, Aus­tralia and India. These are also the sides with the most fin­an­cial dom­in­ance in the game, and the biggest home-based tour­na­ments. Is daar 'n skakel?

How many of the play­ers for these 3 sides have played long-format crick­et in con­di­tions oth­er than their own? Chris Rogers has played some county crick­et — and unsur­pris­ingly led the way in runs for Aus­tralia with an aver­age of over 54, met slegs 3 of the side man­aging to aver­age over 40. The fig­ures look even more clear if you exclude the Aus­trali­an friendly wick­et at Lords, with Rogers and Warner man­aging to aver­age 35 and no-one else man­aging over 17!

So does the same logic apply to Eng­land and India? Do many Indi­an play­ers play long-format crick­et out­side India? Do any Eng­land play­ers play long-format out­side Eng­land? Die eenvoudige antwoord is nee!

What about the oth­er test sides? Many of their play­ers DO play a lot of their crick­et abroad.

The les­son is clear — Aus­tralia, Eng­land and India all need their play­ers to spend more time play­ing abroad (dif­fi­cult with how much crick­et it played these days) or they need to find anoth­er way to bet­ter pre­pare play­ers for for­eign con­di­tions. Eng­land need more county sides (and facil­it­ies) to pre­pare play­ers for the pace and bounce of Aus­tralia and the spin of the sub­con­tin­ent. Like­wise Aus­tralia and India need more play­ers to play in county cricket.

Jy mag dalk ook hou van..

Maak 'n opvolg-bydrae