ಆದ್ದರಿಂದ, ಜಿಜ್ಞಾಸೆ 1ಸ್ಟ ಟ್ರೆಂಟ್ ಸೇತುವೆಯಲ್ಲಿನ ಆಶಸ್ ಟೆಸ್ಟ್ ಇನ್ನೂ ಸ್ಪಷ್ಟ ವಿಜೇತರು ಹೊರಹೊಮ್ಮದೆ ರೋಮಾಂಚನಕಾರಿಯಾಗಿದೆ. ಹೇಗಾದರೂ ನಾನು ಆಟದ ಪ್ರಮುಖ ಕ್ಷಣಕ್ಕೆ ಹಿಂತಿರುಗಿ ನೋಡಲು ಬಯಸುತ್ತೇನೆ - ಆಸ್ಟ್ರೇಲಿಯಾದ ಅಗರ್‌ಗೆ ನೀಡಲಾದ “ನಾಟ್ out ಟ್” ನಿರ್ಧಾರ. ನಾನು ಸ್ಪಷ್ಟವಾಗಿರಲಿ - ಯಾವುದೇ ಆಟಗಾರರು ಅಥವಾ ಆನ್-ಫೀಲ್ಡ್ ಅಂಪೈರ್‌ಗಳ ಮೇಲೆ ಯಾವುದೇ ದೋಷವನ್ನು ಹಾಕಲಾಗುವುದಿಲ್ಲ - ಡಿಆರ್ಎಸ್ ವ್ಯವಸ್ಥೆಯಲ್ಲಿ ಮತ್ತು ಅದನ್ನು ನಿರ್ವಹಿಸುವ ಅಂಪೈರ್‌ನಲ್ಲಿ ಮಾತ್ರ. ಈ ಟೆಸ್ಟ್ ಪಂದ್ಯದಲ್ಲಿ ಮತ್ತು ಇತ್ತೀಚಿನ ಚಾಂಪಿಯನ್ಸ್ ಟ್ರೋಫಿಯಲ್ಲಿ ಹಲವಾರು ತಪ್ಪು ನಿರ್ಧಾರಗಳು ಬಂದಿವೆ, ಹೊತ್ತಿಗೆ ಅವರನ್ನು ಪ್ರತಿ ನೋಡಲು ಅನುಮತಿಸುತ್ತದೆ.
ಆದ್ದರಿಂದ, lets list the really poor decisions involving England so far this summer, ತದನಂತರ ಅನುಕ್ರಮವಾಗಿ ಪ್ರತಿ ಎದುರಿಸಲು
1. ಆಷ್ಟನ್ ಅಗಾರ್, given not out when stumped (England vs Australia, ಮೊದಲ ಟೆಸ್ಟ್, Day 2)
Agar was stumped by Matt Prior. The on-field umpire called for a 3RD umpire decision as it was too close to call. The pictures clearly showed the foot was ON the line. To be given not out the foot must be behind the line. Whilst benefit of the doubt goes to the batsman, there was no doubt that Agar did not have his foot behind the line. I find it utterly inexplicable that he was given not out — I think the third umpire should explain what he saw and why he decided to give the decision not out. A video is also available on YouTube, but sadly neither the video nor the following still image are in HD format. If you know of an HD source please let us know.
2. ಜೊನಾಥನ್ ಟ್ರಾಟ್, given out ಎಲ್ಬಿಡಬ್ಲ್ಯೂ after hitting the ball (England vs Australia, ಮೊದಲ ಟೆಸ್ಟ್, Day 2)
ಮೂರನೇ ಅಂಪೈರ್ ನ್ಯಾಯೋಚಿತ ಎಂದು, this decision was wrong due to a failure of the DRS system. Trott was given not out by the on-field umpire but the decision was refered by the Australians. The third umpire gave Trott out as there was no hot-spot evidence that he had hit the ball. However, the crucial side-on hot-spot camera view was not available thanks to Sky using the camera to replay a previous ball. It is fair to say we’ll be writing more about this disgrace in the near future. The third umpire should have told the on-field umpire that he had couldn’t see all of the hot-spot pictures and the proper decision should have been to give the batsman OR the on-field umpire the benefit of the doubt — in either case Trott would have remained not out. The 2 images below clearly show that the ball has moved to the right before hitting the pad, and there is a small mark on snickometer from the impact with the bat in the first image (ಸ್ಪಷ್ಟವಾಗಿ ನೋಡಲು ಪೂರ್ಣ ಗಾತ್ರದ ವೀಕ್ಷಿಸಲು).
3. ಸ್ಟುವರ್ಟ್ ಬ್ರಾಡ್, given not out caught after edging the ball (England vs Australia, ಮೊದಲ ಟೆಸ್ಟ್, Day 3)
ಸರಿ, this one isn’t a fault of the third umpire — it was a genuine mistake by the on-field umpire which would doubtless have been corrected by the third umpire had it been reviewed. It was a very poor on-field decision but the umpire may have been confused by an almost immediate second deflection off the edge of the wicket keepers gloves. Australia were unable to review the decision as they had already wasted both of their reviews earlier in the day. The Australians need to learn to use reviews properly — the review system was introduced to challenge “howlers” like this. Some pundits have also put forward the view the Broad should have walked — we’ll discuss that another time. A clear video of the incident is available on YouTube.
4. ಇಯಾನ್ ಬೆಲ್, given out stumped with his foot behind the line (ಇಂಗ್ಲೆಂಡ್ ವಿರುದ್ಧ ಭಾರತ, Champions Trophy final)
A crucial decision which most likely cost England victory in the Champions Trophy final against India. Bell was given out when the cameras clearly showed his foot was behind the line and grounded.
We’ll try to find high quality images of each of the decisions so you can judge for yourself
“ಗುಲಾಬಿ ಚೆಂಡು ಕೆಂಪು / ಹಸಿರು ಕೊರತೆಯ ದೃಷ್ಟಿಯಲ್ಲಿ ಬೂದು / ನೀಲಿ ಬಣ್ಣದಲ್ಲಿ ಕಾಣುತ್ತದೆ, ಅದರ ತೀವ್ರತೆಯನ್ನು ಅವಲಂಬಿಸಿರುತ್ತದೆ. ನಾನು ಬಣ್ಣ ಕುರುಡುತನದಿಂದ ಸಿಮ್ಯುಲೇಶನ್ ಮಾಡಿದ್ದೇನೆ…”