0హాట్‌స్పాట్ స్నికోమీటర్ హాకీ DRSచెడు DRS నిర్ణయాలు పెరుగుతున్నాయి…

కాబట్టి, చమత్కారం 1స్టంప్ ట్రెంట్ బ్రిడ్జ్ వద్ద యాషెస్ టెస్ట్ ఇంకా స్పష్టమైన విజేతగా బయటపడలేదు. అయినప్పటికీ నేను ఆట యొక్క కీలకమైన క్షణం వైపు తిరిగి చూడాలనుకుంటున్నాను - ఆస్ట్రేలియా అగర్కు ఇచ్చిన “నాట్ అవుట్” నిర్ణయం. నాకు స్పష్టంగా చెప్పనివ్వండి - ఏ ఆటగాళ్ళపై లేదా ఆన్-ఫీల్డ్ అంపైర్లపై ఎటువంటి తప్పు చేయలేరు - DRS వ్యవస్థపై మరియు అంపైర్ దానిని నిర్వహించడం మాత్రమే. ఈ టెస్ట్ మ్యాచ్‌లో మరియు ఇటీవలి ఛాంపియన్స్ ట్రోఫీలో అనేక తప్పుడు నిర్ణయాలు ఉన్నాయి, క్రమంగా వాటిని ప్రతి చూడండి అనుమతిస్తుంది.

కాబట్టి, lets list the really poor decisions involving Eng­land so far this sum­mer, ఆపై క్రమంగా ప్రతి ఎదుర్కోవటానికి

1. అష్టన్ అగర్, giv­en not out when stumped (Eng­land vs Aus­tralia, మొదటి టెస్ట్, 2 వ రోజు)

Agar was stumped by Matt Pri­or. The on-field umpire called for a 3 umpire decision as it was too close to call. The pic­tures clearly showed the foot was ON the line. To be giv­en not out the foot must be behind the line. Whilst bene­fit of the doubt goes to the bats­man, there was no doubt that Agar did not have his foot behind the line. I find it utterly inex­plic­able that he was giv­en not out — I think the third umpire should explain what he saw and why he decided to give the decision not out.  A video is also avail­able on You­Tube, but sadly neither the video nor the fol­low­ing still image are in HD format.  If you know of an HD source please let us know.

అష్టన్ అగర్ స్టంప్డ్ డ్రస్ను

2. జోనాథన్ ట్రోట్, giv­en out LBW after hit­ting the ball (Eng­land vs Aus­tralia, మొదటి టెస్ట్, 2 వ రోజు)

మూడవ అంపైర్ ప్రదర్శనగా, this decision was wrong due to a fail­ure of the DRS sys­tem. Trott was giv­en not out by the on-field umpire but the decision was ref­ered by the Aus­trali­ans. The third umpire gave Trott out as there was no hot-spot evid­ence that he had hit the ball. How­ever, the cru­cial side-on hot-spot cam­era view was not avail­able thanks to Sky using the cam­era to replay a pre­vi­ous ball. It is fair to say we’ll be writ­ing more about this dis­grace in the near future. The third umpire should have told the on-field umpire that he had could­n’t see all of the hot-spot pic­tures and the prop­er decision should have been to give the bats­man OR the on-field umpire the bene­fit of the doubt — in either case Trott would have remained not out.  ది 2 images below clearly show that the ball has moved to the right before hit­ting the pad, and there is a small mark on snicko­met­er from the impact with the bat in the first image (స్పష్టంగా చూడటానికి దీన్ని పూర్తి పరిమాణం వీక్షించడానికి).

జోనాథన్ ట్రాట్ help సూచనలు హాట్స్పాట్ వైఫల్యం జోనాథన్ ట్రాట్ help సూచనలు హాట్స్పాట్ వైఫల్యం

3. స్టువర్ట్ బ్రాడ్, giv­en not out caught after edging the ball (Eng­land vs Aus­tralia, మొదటి టెస్ట్, Day 3)

అలాగే, this one isn’t a fault of the third umpire — it was a genu­ine mis­take by the on-field umpire which would doubt­less have been cor­rec­ted by the third umpire had it been reviewed. It was a very poor on-field decision but the umpire may have been con­fused by an almost imme­di­ate second deflec­tion off the edge of the wick­et keep­ers gloves. Aus­tralia were unable to review the decision as they had already wasted both of their reviews earli­er in the day. The Aus­trali­ans need to learn to use reviews prop­erly — the review sys­tem was intro­duced to chal­lenge “howl­ers” like this. Some pun­dits have also put for­ward the view the Broad should have walked — we’ll dis­cuss that anoth­er time.  A clear video of the incid­ent is avail­able on You­Tube.

4. ఇయాన్ బెల్, giv­en out stumped with his foot behind the line (ఇంగ్లాండ్ భారతదేశం వర్సెస్, Cham­pi­ons Trophy final)

A cru­cial decision which most likely cost Eng­land vic­tory in the Cham­pi­ons Trophy final against India. Bell was giv­en out when the cam­er­as clearly showed his foot was behind the line and grounded.

ఇయాన్ బెల్, ధోనీ స్టంప్డ్, ఛాంపియన్స్ ట్రోఫీ ఫైనల్ 2013

We’ll try to find high qual­ity images of each of the decisions so you can judge for yourself

సమాధానం ఇవ్వూ