બ્રાડ હેડિન સાથે ખૂબ સારી પ્રેસ મેળવવામાં - વસ્તુઓ છે કે જે મને શ્રેણી દરમિયાન આશ્ચર્ય એક કેવી રીતે પંડિતો સરખામણીમાં સંબંધિત વિકેટ કીપરો હતી, જ્યારે મેટ પ્રાયોરને થોડું નકારાત્મક એકંદર રેટિંગ મળ્યું. મેં જે જોયું તેનાથી મને લાગતું નથી કે તેમની વચ્ચે ઘણું બધુ છે, તેથી હું વિચારું છું હું કેવી રીતે નંબરો સ્ટેક જુઓ છો. હું તેમજ બાજુઓ બાકીના માટે જ કરવું અને જોઈ શકે છે figured જો શ્રેણી એક ટીમ ઉભરી કે પ્રતિબિંબિત કરે છે કેટલી સારી રીતે વ્યક્તિઓ ભજવી છે.
તેથી, તે સાથે સોદો કરી શકો છો 2 men behind the wicket first
|કૅચસ||સ્ટમપિંગ્સ / રન આઉટ||ઇનિંગ્સ||કોઈ રન નોંધાયો નહીં||Average||50ઓ||100ઓ||ઉચ્ચ સ્કોર||નથી પથ્થરો|
Overall Haddin has the fractionally better batting average, and undeniably took a lot more catches behind the wicket. However, તમે માત્ર પકડી શકે છે શું તમારી રીતે આવે છે, so a more telling number would be the number of missed opportunities. Missed opportunities are hard to quantify of course. The batting numbers aren’t different enough to justify picking 1 player over the other, and had Prior played 1 અથવા 2 વધુ દાવ, એક અને કરવામાં 50, the averages would be near enough equal.
Regardless of the views of the pundits, on balance I’d pick Prior. Firstly I have a sense that Haddin made more mistakes behind the wicket with a few missed chances. Secondly, I have a greater faith that Prior would be the man in a pressure situation — despite a good effort Haddin failed to see Australia through to victory in the first test.
I’ve only included players who bowled at least 50 overs
|ઓવરને||કોઈ રન નોંધાયો નહીં||Wickets||Average||Economy|
|ટિમ બ્રેસ્નનનો બોલ||91||296||10||29.60||3.25|
The numbers match up fairly well with who I’d pick for my team. Anyone who watched any of the series would be able to pick Graeme Swann, Ryan Harris & James Anderson without a hesitation, leaving the only question who the 4મી bowler would be. As the 3RD highest wicket taker, અને બેટ સાથે ખૂબ સરળ હોવા, Stuart Broad is the easy choice. He was also more economical than either Siddle or Starc. The final confirmation of these 4 તેઓ હોય છે 4 ના 5 who had an average under 30 — Tim Bresnan being the only other bowler to achieve this.
દરેક બાજુ છે 1 very good bowler who is unlucky to miss out — Tim Bresnan for England and Peter Siddle for Australia. Both players are hard working, બેટ સાથે યોગ્ય, and contribute well in the field. Bresnan took his wickets slightly cheaper, whilst Siddle was a bit more economical per over bowled and both picked up key wickets at key times. The choice between them would probably come down to the flip of a coin if a 5મી bowler was going to be picked.
The balance of the bowlers for varying conditions also works out very well. Swann is the best spinner in the world at the moment and Anderson is one of the top 2 bowlers outright with wonderful control and an ability to find swing in any conditions. Broad has the ability to both move the ball and bowl genuinely fast to pressure any batsman who struggles with short pitched deliveries. Harris is consistently accurate and has a skiddy speed which will unsettle even quality batsmen on good surfaces. Neither side has a really top class genuinely fast bowler which is the only chink in the quality of the attack.
I’ve only included genuine batsmen, and have excluded a couple of the Aussie batsmen who only played in the first or second test (and didn’t do well)
|ઇનિંગ્સ||કોઈ રન નોંધાયો નહીં||Average||50ઓ||100ઓ||ઉચ્ચ સ્કોર||અણનમ|
Picking a batting line up is far less straight-forward then a bowling attack. Ian Bell is the only batsman who can be picked without having to think. Michael Clarke also has a good average but is helped by 2 નથી પથ્થરો (as a result of declarations). That said, Clarke is a world-class batsman and it would be pretty hard to justify leaving him out of the side.
The remaining 4 are trickier to select. Shane Watson is useful with the ball and made the 3RD highest average, but he has a tendency to make runs when they don’t matter, and get out when a score is needed. I also haven’t yet picked any openers, and Watson didn’t play well as an opener (and isn’t consistent enough) અને હકીકત એ છે કે તે માત્ર લીધો 2 wickets means he’s not going to make the team. Chris Rogers surprised me and had a much better series than I expected him to. He improved as the series went on and he was a very calm and consistent player — ideal as an opener. As a result he makes the team.
Pieterson સહેજ નીચે પાર શ્રેણી હતી, however he had to find form early on having just returned from an injury he was clearly still carrying throughout the last test. His ability to make game changing runs, અને સ્કોર જ્યારે રન સૌથી જરૂરી છે (and his sheer entertainment value) definitely gets him a place.
I still need another opener and the remaining choice is between the “bar fight 2”. The numbers make this easy, and Root’s reasonable average is particularly impressive given the pressure he was under making his opening debut in such a key series. He is also a much more careful player than Warner which is better suited to test cricket, and he showed he is a quick learner by improving his technique as the series went on.
This leaves just a final batsman to pick. The numbers say Steve Smith but I wasn’t at all convinced that he was a test batsman. Without his 1 high score and his “not out” innings enhancing it, his average would be under 21 which is a more accurate reflection of the series he had. Khawaja had a very poor series and is out of the picture so that leaves the choice of Trott, Bairstow and Cook. Despite his disappointing series with the bat it’s easy to pick the Ashes winning captain as the captain for the whole team, especially if he were a touch down the order to relieve the pressure that opening and being captain brings.
The numbers and my line up aren’t quite a match, પરંતુ હું લેવામાં કર્યું 5 ટોચ 7 by numbers and added in Alastair Cook, who despite his disappointing series would be hard to leave out. The 2 who miss out — Shane Watson and Steve Smith have both managed to produce numbers that very much flatter the reality of how well they played. This is doubly so when you consider that the 2 players I have picked instead (કૂક & રુટ) both had to face tougher conditions as opening batsmen.
અંતિમ લાઇન અપ
- ક્રિસ રોજર્સ
- જૉ રુટ
- એલિસ્ટર કૂક (સી)
- Kevin Pieterson
- માઈકલ ક્લાર્ક
- ઇયાન બેલ
- Matt Prior (W)
- ગ્રીમ સ્વાન
- Stuart Broad
- Ryan Harris
- James Anderson
This is a very strong but somewhat unbalanced side, સાથે જ 3 Australians compared to 8 Englishmen. However, England have just won 3–0 and were good money for that scoreline. No-one would have blinked if a similar “best of” team from the 90’s was largely Australian, તેથી તે હવે આનંદ કે કોષ્ટકો ચાલુ છે દો.
આ ઉપયોગી મળી? કૃપા કરીને અમને જણાવો નથી નીચે એક ટિપ્પણી છોડી દેવા દ્વારા. તમે સબ્સ્ક્રાઇબ કરવા ઈચ્છો, તો જમણી ટોચ પર મેનુ પર લિંક સબ્સ્ક્રાઇબ ઉપયોગ કરો. તમે પણ નીચે સામાજિક લિંક્સ ઉપયોગ કરીને તમારા મિત્રો સાથે આ શેર કરી શકો છો. ટીમે.