ਬਰੈਡ ਹੈਡਿਨ ਨਾਲ ਇੱਕ ਪਰੈਟੀ ਚੰਗਾ ਪ੍ਰੈਸ ਹੋ ਰਹੀ - ਜੋ ਕਿ ਕੁਝ ਮੈਨੂੰ ਲੜੀ ਦੌਰਾਨ ਹੈਰਾਨ ਦੀ ਇੱਕ ਨੂੰ ਪੰਡਿਤ ਦੀ ਤੁਲਨਾ ਆਪੋ ਵਿਕਟ ਦਰਬਾਨ ਸੀ, ਜਦੋਂ ਕਿ ਮੈਟ ਪ੍ਰਾਇਰ ਨੂੰ ਸਮੁੱਚੀ ਨਕਾਰਾਤਮਕ ਸਮੁੱਚੀ ਰੇਟਿੰਗ ਮਿਲੀ. ਜੋ ਮੈਂ ਦੇਖਿਆ ਉਸ ਤੋਂ ਮੈਂ ਨਹੀਂ ਸੋਚਿਆ ਸੀ ਕਿ ਉਨ੍ਹਾਂ ਦੇ ਵਿਚਕਾਰ ਬਹੁਤ ਕੁਝ ਲੈਣਾ ਹੈ, ਇਸ ਲਈ ਮੈਂ ਸੋਚਿਆ ਕਿ ਮੈਂ ਵੇਖਾਂਗਾ ਕਿ ਕਿਵੇਂ ਨੰਬਰ ਇਕੱਠੇ ਹੁੰਦੇ ਹਨ. ਮੈਂ ਸੋਚਿਆ ਕਿ ਮੈਂ ਬਾਕੀ ਦੇ ਪੱਖਾਂ ਲਈ ਵੀ ਅਜਿਹਾ ਹੀ ਕਰ ਸਕਦਾ ਹਾਂ ਅਤੇ ਦੇਖਾਂਗਾ ਕਿ ਕੀ ਲੜੀ ਦੀ ਕੋਈ ਟੀਮ ਉਭਰਦੀ ਹੈ ਜੋ ਇਹ ਦਰਸਾਉਂਦੀ ਹੈ ਕਿ ਵਿਅਕਤੀਆਂ ਨੇ ਕਿੰਨੀ ਚੰਗੀ ਖੇਡ ਨਿਭਾਈ..
ਇਸ ਲਈ, ਉਹ ਦੇ ਨਾਲ ਸੌਦਾ ਕਰਨ ਦਿੰਦਾ ਹੈ 2 men behind the wicket first
|ਕੈਚ||ਸਟੰਪਿੰਗ / ਚਲਾਉਣ ਨਾਕਆਊਟ||ਪਾਰੀ||ਰਨ||Average||50ਹਵਾਈਅੱਡੇ||100ਹਵਾਈਅੱਡੇ||ਉੱਚ ਸਕੋਰ||ਨਾ ਨਾਕਆਊਟ|
Overall Haddin has the fractionally better batting average, and undeniably took a lot more catches behind the wicket. However, ਤੁਹਾਨੂੰ ਸਿਰਫ ਫੜਨ ਕਰ ਸਕਦੇ ਹੋ ਕਿ ਕੀ ਆਪਣੇ ਤਰੀਕੇ ਨਾਲ ਆਇਆ ਹੈ, so a more telling number would be the number of missed opportunities. Missed opportunities are hard to quantify of course. The batting numbers aren’t different enough to justify picking 1 player over the other, and had Prior played 1 ਜ 2 ਹੋਰ ਪਾਰੀ, ਇੱਕ ਅਤੇ ਕੀਤੀ 50, the averages would be near enough equal.
Regardless of the views of the pundits, on balance I’d pick Prior. Firstly I have a sense that Haddin made more mistakes behind the wicket with a few missed chances. Secondly, I have a greater faith that Prior would be the man in a pressure situation — despite a good effort Haddin failed to see Australia through to victory in the first test.
I’ve only included players who bowled at least 50 overs
The numbers match up fairly well with who I’d pick for my team. Anyone who watched any of the series would be able to pick Graeme Swann, ਰਿਆਨ ਹੈਰਿਸ & James Anderson without a hesitation, leaving the only question who the 4th bowler would be. As the 3rd highest wicket taker, ਅਤੇ ਬੱਲੇਬਾਜ਼ੀ ਦੇ ਨਾਲ ਪਰੈਟੀ ਸੌਖਾ ਹੋਣ, Stuart Broad is the easy choice. He was also more economical than either Siddle or Starc. The final confirmation of these 4 ਉਹ ਹਨ, ਜੋ ਕਿ ਹੈ 4 ਦੀ 5 who had an average under 30 — Tim Bresnan being the only other bowler to achieve this.
ਹਰ ਪਾਸੇ ਹੈ 1 very good bowler who is unlucky to miss out — Tim Bresnan for England and Peter Siddle for Australia. Both players are hard working, ਬੱਲੇਬਾਜ਼ੀ ਦੇ ਨਾਲ ਵਿਨੀਤ, and contribute well in the field. Bresnan took his wickets slightly cheaper, whilst Siddle was a bit more economical per over bowled and both picked up key wickets at key times. The choice between them would probably come down to the flip of a coin if a 5th bowler was going to be picked.
The balance of the bowlers for varying conditions also works out very well. Swann is the best spinner in the world at the moment and Anderson is one of the top 2 bowlers outright with wonderful control and an ability to find swing in any conditions. Broad has the ability to both move the ball and bowl genuinely fast to pressure any batsman who struggles with short pitched deliveries. Harris is consistently accurate and has a skiddy speed which will unsettle even quality batsmen on good surfaces. Neither side has a really top class genuinely fast bowler which is the only chink in the quality of the attack.
I’ve only included genuine batsmen, and have excluded a couple of the Aussie batsmen who only played in the first or second test (and didn’t do well)
|ਪਾਰੀ||ਰਨ||Average||50ਹਵਾਈਅੱਡੇ||100ਹਵਾਈਅੱਡੇ||ਉੱਚ ਸਕੋਰ||ਨਾ ਬਾਹਰ|
Picking a batting line up is far less straight-forward then a bowling attack. Ian Bell is the only batsman who can be picked without having to think. Michael Clarke also has a good average but is helped by 2 ਨਾ-ਨਾਕਆਊਟ (as a result of declarations). That said, Clarke is a world-class batsman and it would be pretty hard to justify leaving him out of the side.
The remaining 4 are trickier to select. Shane Watson is useful with the ball and made the 3rd highest average, but he has a tendency to make runs when they don’t matter, and get out when a score is needed. I also haven’t yet picked any openers, and Watson didn’t play well as an opener (and isn’t consistent enough) ਅਤੇ ਅਸਲ ਉਹ ਸਿਰਫ ਲੈ ਲਿਆ 2 wickets means he’s not going to make the team. Chris Rogers surprised me and had a much better series than I expected him to. He improved as the series went on and he was a very calm and consistent player — ideal as an opener. As a result he makes the team.
Pieterson ਇੱਕ ਥੋੜ੍ਹਾ ਹੇਠ ਬਰਾਬਰ ਦੀ ਲੜੀ ਸੀ, however he had to find form early on having just returned from an injury he was clearly still carrying throughout the last test. His ability to make game changing runs, ਅਤੇ ਸਕੋਰ ਨੂੰ ਜਦ ਰਨ ਸਭ ਦੀ ਲੋੜ ਹੈ (and his sheer entertainment value) definitely gets him a place.
I still need another opener and the remaining choice is between the “bar fight 2”. The numbers make this easy, and Root’s reasonable average is particularly impressive given the pressure he was under making his opening debut in such a key series. He is also a much more careful player than Warner which is better suited to test cricket, and he showed he is a quick learner by improving his technique as the series went on.
This leaves just a final batsman to pick. The numbers say Steve Smith but I wasn’t at all convinced that he was a test batsman. Without his 1 high score and his “not out” innings enhancing it, his average would be under 21 which is a more accurate reflection of the series he had. Khawaja had a very poor series and is out of the picture so that leaves the choice of Trott, Bairstow and Cook. Despite his disappointing series with the bat it’s easy to pick the Ashes winning captain as the captain for the whole team, especially if he were a touch down the order to relieve the pressure that opening and being captain brings.
The numbers and my line up aren’t quite a match, ਪਰ ਮੈਨੂੰ ਚੁੱਕਿਆ ਕੀਤਾ ਹੈ 5 ਚੋਟੀ ਦੇ ਦੇ 7 by numbers and added in Alastair Cook, who despite his disappointing series would be hard to leave out. The 2 who miss out — Shane Watson and Steve Smith have both managed to produce numbers that very much flatter the reality of how well they played. This is doubly so when you consider that the 2 players I have picked instead (ਕੁੱਕ & ਰੂਟ) both had to face tougher conditions as opening batsmen.
- ਕ੍ਰਿਸ ਰੋਜਰਸ
- ਜੋਅ ਰੂਟ
- ਐਲਿਸਟੇਅਰ ਕੁੱਕ (C)
- Kevin Pieterson
- ਮਾਈਕਲ ਕਲਾਰਕ
- ਇਆਨ ਬੈੱਲ
- Matt Prior (w)
- ਗ੍ਰੀਮ ਸਵਾਨ
- ਸਟੂਅਰਟ ਬਰਾਡ
- ਰਿਆਨ ਹੈਰਿਸ
- ਯਾਕੂਬ Anderson
This is a very strong but somewhat unbalanced side, ਨਾਲ ਹੀ 3 Australians compared to 8 Englishmen. However, England have just won 3–0 and were good money for that scoreline. No-one would have blinked if a similar “best of” team from the 90’s was largely Australian, ਇਸ ਦੇ ਲਈ ਇਸ ਨੂੰ ਹੁਣ ਦਾ ਆਨੰਦ ਹੈ, ਜੋ ਕਿ ਟੇਬਲ ਬਦਲ ਦਿੱਤਾ ਹੈ ਚਾਹੀਦਾ ਹੈ.
ਕਿਰਪਾ ਕਰਕੇ ਹੇਠ ਟਿੱਪਣੀ ਦੇ ਕੇ ਸਾਨੂੰ ਆਪਣੇ ਵਿਚਾਰ ਭੇਜਣ! ਤੁਹਾਨੂੰ subscribe ਕਰਨਾ ਚਾਹੁੰਦੇ ਹੋ ਸੱਜੇ ਸਿਖਰ 'ਤੇ ਮੇਨੂ' ਤੇ ਲਿੰਕ ਨੂੰ subscribe ਦਾ ਉਪਯੋਗ ਕਰੋ. ਤੁਹਾਨੂੰ ਇਹ ਵੀ ਹੇਠ ਸਮਾਜਿਕ ਲਿੰਕ ਨੂੰ ਵਰਤ ਕੇ ਆਪਣੇ ਦੋਸਤ ਦੇ ਨਾਲ ਇਸ ਨੂੰ ਸ਼ੇਅਰ ਕਰ ਸਕਦਾ ਹੈ. ਖੁਸ਼ ਰਹੋ.