2England and Wales Cricket Board logoAll new England, without KP

In the biggest crick­et news of the day Eng­land have announced Kev­in Pieterson will no longer be in their plans, effect­ively sack­ing their lead­ing bats­man.  This has finally triggered me to write my first art­icle since the dis­astrous Ashes series began nearly 2 months ago.  I’d like to give you fair warn­ing read­er, that as hard as I try to always be pos­it­ive about the great game there are occa­sion­al days where what needs say­ing just doesn’t feel very pos­it­ive.  This is one of them…

I wish to present a case to you, a case that at the top levels of Eng­lish crick­et there has been a series of ser­i­ous fail­ures, and that these fail­ures that show no sign of being cor­rec­ted.  I will also out­line my altern­at­ive to the cur­rent status quo.

1. The fail­ure to man­age KP

KP has been a tre­mend­ously suc­cess­ful crick­eter for Eng­land.  He is the play­er who par­tic­u­larly excites the crowd.  The guy who can totally change a game with the bat.  There haven’t been many like him, and won’t be many like him again.  He does how­ever have his issues, and these need care­ful, thought­ful and cre­at­ive man­age­ment.  When Michael Vaughan was cap­tain there weren’t the same pub­lic issues with KP, and when you hear Michael Vaughan talk about KP it is easy to tell why.  Vaughan is clearly someone with impress­ive people-man­age­ment skills.  The ECB should have ensured, after the first KP débâcle (when he was sacked as Cap­tain), that they had someone in place to man­age him.  As I argue below, I would infact extend this idea and believe the setup should have a fig­ure­head “man­ager” who man­ages the team, coaches, play­ers etc.  Someone like Michael Vaughan?

2. Fail­ure to man­age the media

The media haven’t been kind to Eng­land recently.  How­ever, most of this appears to me to be of England’s own mak­ing.  As a team they’ve appeared to the out­side world to be very insu­lar.  Every defeat or poor per­form­ance is met with a “we know best how to fix this” atti­tude which is both unne­ces­sar­ily defens­ive, and also guar­an­teed to frus­trate the pun­dits.  Frus­trated pun­dits still need to fill columns, which they do by find­ing oth­er things to write about, and these are fre­quently in less favour­able terms when the pun­dit in ques­tion has been effect­ively stone­walled by the team.  A basic study of media beha­viour, and indi­vidu­al psy­cho­logy, should have made it obvi­ous that more pos­it­ive con­nec­tions with the media would be a good idea — espe­cially as so many of the lead­ing pun­dits are former top crick­eters them­selves.

3. The chal­lenges of cap­taincy

Cap­tain after cap­tain takes on the cap­taincy, and with­in a year sees their aver­age drop.  Eng­land have a long his­tory of appoint­ing top (and usu­ally open­ing) bats­men as cap­tain, who then loses form, put­ting them­selves and the team under pres­sure.  In the mod­ern game, with the numer­ous demands from spon­sors, media, etc the team setup needs to be re-eval­u­ated.  Pla­cing the primary respons­ib­il­it­ies on a play­er doesn’t seem sens­ible to me.  Can you ima­gine the play­er-cap­tain in a foot­ball team hav­ing the same level of respons­ib­il­it­ies?  The cap­tain already needs a sub­stan­tial range of skills — skill as a crick­et play­er, skill as a tac­ti­cian, and skill as a per­son-man­ager.  Heap­ing addi­tion­al respons­ib­il­it­ies on the cap­tain will, most likely, lead to a reduc­tion in the time and resources they have avail­able for their primary respons­ib­il­it­ies.  The ECB should appoint a team Man­ager, who has the same kinds of respons­ib­il­it­ies as a foot­ball man­ager.  This per­son should be respons­ible for all the media inter­views, whilst play­ers and cap­tain focus on the actu­al play­ing of the game.

4. Man­aging the coach­ing sys­tem

It seems to me that dif­fer­ent play­er per­son­al­it­ies click bet­ter with dif­fer­ent coaches.  Some (e.g. Alastair Cook) may well thrive with a highly tech­nic­al and crit­ic­al coach (a Geoff Boy­cott char­ac­ter for example), whilst oth­ers (Pieterson) clearly wouldn’t get the best from this kind of coach.  So the obvi­ous ques­tion is why have a single bat­ting coach.  How about hav­ing a coach for each play­er, or for a coach for sev­er­al groups of play­ers.  The impact of find­ing the “right” coach is illus­trated nicely by the change in suc­cess for Andy Mur­ray after he star­ted work­ing with coach Ivan Lendl at the start of 2012.

5. Man­aging play­er selec­tion

The Joe Root situ­ation is one that has again illus­trated how incom­pet­ent some think­ing in the Eng­land setup has been of late.  The ini­tial decision to bring in a very tal­en­ted young­ster was a good decision.  Since there everything has gone a bit astray.  Root should have been giv­en a year or more to slot into the team before he was moved to open­er.  Mov­ing him to open­er imme­di­ately ahead of an ashes series, albeit it at home against a poor Aus­tralia side, was not a sens­ible gamble, espe­cially with a good range of oth­er options avail­able to Eng­land to open.  How­ever, hav­ing made the decision to drop him at the deep end the select­ors should have been will­ing to com­mit to giv­ing him a good run in the pos­i­tion to give him time to find his feet there.  Instead they lost faith and dropped him back down the order send­ing the kind of mixed mes­sages that are so often det­ri­ment­al to a play­ers con­fid­ence.

6. Play­er psy­cho­lo­gic­al man­age­ment

Eng­land are begin­ning to devel­op a his­tory of play­ers who have struggled under the pres­sures of the mod­ern game.  Mar­cus Trescothick was one of the finest open­ing bats­men Eng­land have ever had, lost early to the team due to stress.  Steve Harmis­on “didn’t travel well”, and Jonath­an Trott has clearly been strug­gling for some time.  I’m also going to include Graeme Swann in this list, as he is the finest spin­ner Eng­land have had in the whole time I’ve been fol­low­ing the game, and his retire­ment is hugely pre­ma­ture.  Some­how all of these play­ers got to a point where they felt some­thing was wrong, either with them or with their game.  The same could even be said for the pre­ma­ture retire­ment of former cap­tain Andrew Strauss.  Whilst not every pos­sible issue can be anti­cip­ated or man­aged to the extent that the play­er can remain part of the team, the num­ber of Eng­land play­ers suf­fer­ing seems high­er than oth­er inter­na­tion­al sides.  I’m not an expert on psy­cho­logy, but it seems to me that unless this is a highly improb­able stat­ist­ic­al spike there is some­thing wrong with the Eng­land setup.  The answer may lie with pro­fes­sion­al psy­cho­lo­gists, it may lie with expert­ise from oth­er inter­na­tion­al sides, or it may lie with former pros, but the ECB should at the very least be try­ing to find out what has gone wrong, and try­ing to learn how to pre­vent sim­il­ar prob­lems devel­op­ing in the future.  Although I am by no means an expert, I do reg­u­larly deal with teen­agers who have lost con­fid­ence in their ‘abil­ity’ or lost their nat­ur­al sense of curi­os­ity, and based on this exper­i­ence, I recom­mend the ECB start by look­ing at the work of Car­ol Dweck.

7. Man­age­ment of tours and matches

This is the one area where Eng­land have done reas­on­ably well in recent years.  Eng­land have led the way in hav­ing dif­fer­ent sides for T20 and 50-over crick­et, and using these sides to devel­op young­sters with a view to them poten­tially pro­gress­ing to full Test crick­et.  There is still much room for improve­ment how­ever.  How we agreed to back-to-back Ashes series is some­thing I will nev­er under­stand — I can entirely under­stand the play­ers on the way to Aus­tralia think­ing “Haven’t we just sweated blood and tears to win this urn?  Why do we have to do it again straight away?”  There is also far too much ‘oth­er’ crick­et being played.  If we have a T20 world cup, Big Bash, IPL, and oth­ers, do we really need some T20 matches on every tour we go on?  The same goes for 50-over crick­et.  I’d love to vis­it Aus­tralia in the Brit­ish winter for 7–8 weeks — but if I was spend­ing half the year abroad without my wife and kids I think I’d soon start to feel tired, miser­able, and neg­at­ive about the game.  Lim­it­ing for­eign tours to an 8 week max­im­um, and play­ing a max­im­um of 2 away test series a year would still provide plenty of crick­et and mean those play­ers who don’t like being away so much will always have suf­fi­cient “light at the end of the tun­nel” to be able to focus on their game.  Fur­ther­more — if we can play 2 away series a year, we can also play 2 home series a year.  It is per­fectly pos­sible to play crick­et in Eng­land from May until Septem­ber — more than enough time for 8 or more Test matches.  Play­ing more home tests a year would be very bene­fi­cial to the counties who have inves­ted in grounds.

What do you think? Drop us a comment below! If you would like to subscribe please use the subscribe link on the menu at the top right. You can also share this with your friends by using the social links below. Cheers.

You might also like...

Leave a Reply

2 Comments

gravatarGay Ball

we all miss you kp..but on pos­it­ive side this is good oppor­tun­ity for the young play­er of Eng­land crick­et team that they can show their tal­ent and do some­thing like this, that cre­ate his­tory..

Reply
gravatarJon A Scaife

KP appears to have been made a scape­goat, as does Andy Flower. Every­one involved in the Ashes series will be want­ing to ‘make good’ — to show that they can per­form bet­ter than they did in Aus­tralia — and they should be giv­en a chance to do that before selec­tion decisions are made for the next Test series. To loc­ate the cause of the Ashes fail­ure in the actions of par­tic­u­lar indi­vidu­als is clas­sic scape­goat­ism and isn’t a good start to the new ECB régime. If KP or any­one else had been found guilty of ser­i­ous unpro­fes­sion­al beha­viour then sack­ing might be an appro­pri­ate response but this hasn’t been sug­ges­ted. So what are the grounds for his remov­al? Appar­ently the issue is that he is too indi­vidu­al­ist­ic for the cur­rent ‘team eth­ic’. There would, then, have been no room in the cur­rent squad for Boy­cott, Lillee, Gayle or Warne. Botham might not have made it either. They’re using inver­ted logic. A team eth­ic should embrace and nur­ture diverse indi­vidu­al qual­it­ies for the bene­fit of all.

Reply