0How to manage a problem like England

In a way I am almost glad Eng­land failed to grind out a draw against Sri Lanka. Had they done so it would have been seen by many as some sort of mira­cu­lous escape. Backs to the wall, sto­ic defence when the chips were down. It must not, how­ever, detract from a dire per­form­ance. For the ump­teenth time the bats­men have let us down. The last Ashes on Eng­lish soil were won des­pite, not because of our bats­men and the over­all pic­ture hasn’t improved since then.


In this test the bat­ting line up failed against a very mediocre bowl­ing attack (God help them if Lasith Malinga or Mut­ti­ah Mur­a­lithar­in had been play­ing) and the bowl­ing attack failed too. Shock­ing per­form­ance all round really. We should have had them out in the first test too and a 1–1 draw sounds a lot bet­ter than a home-series defeat.
Com­ment­at­ors are start­ing to call for Cap­tain Cook’s head served up on a sil­ver plat­ter. As open­er the side look to Cook to be there, to sup­port the side as they look to put the runs on the board. Cook is endur­ing a shock­ing run of form and ques­tions are start­ing to be asked – both about his pos­i­tion at the top of the order and as cap­tain. But the ques­tion remains – what is the altern­at­ive? Drop him from both roles? That would mean either a tried, tested and failed option as open­er (Car­berry / Compton) or anoth­er rook­ie in the side – a rook­ie sup­port­ing fel­low rook­ies Sam Rob­son, Gary Bal­lance, Moeen Ali and rel­at­ive new­comer, Joe Root. Then you have the ques­tion about who skip­pers the side? If you go with the old adage of nev­er pick­ing a bowl­er as your cap­tain then Ian Bell is the only con­tender. He’s stood in for Cook on occa­sion but it would be a mighty gamble giv­ing him the arm­band.
So instead you keep a cool head and look at Cook’s record. As a bats­man he is undoubtedly world class. If he keeps his place there is every like­li­hood he will become England’s record run scorer. Class always shines through and I would back him to regain his touch.
As a cap­tain he’s done pretty well. Some would accuse him of being too defens­ive oth­ers attack him for a per­ceived lack of dynam­ism. Cer­tainly I would prefer a Michael Vaughan at the helm but Cook is who we have.
What should hap­pen is that we appoint a man­ager who takes every respons­ib­il­ity away from the Cap­tain (who­ever that may be) and deals with it him­self. All the cap­tain would have to focus on is his own game and the side’s over­all per­form­ance on the field of play. I may have mis­heard but I’m sure someone said that from the toss at the start of the match until he got back into the dress­ing room, Cook had to con­duct 15 media inter­views. Each one meant him hav­ing to watch every word that came forth from his mouth. Each one mak­ing him think hard about his answers. That can’t be good. The cap­tain needs to be think­ing about how he is going to mar­shal the troops in battle and ulti­mately win the game. A man­ager would be more of a focal point with the cap­tain almost invis­ible but to his on-field charges. The man­ager would then take on the post-match press con­fer­ence and be the one who deals with the big issues such as the Pietersen affair. Sure, the cap­tain can have an input, but behind the scenes, away from the pub­lic gaze.

Found this useful? Please do let us know by dropping a comment below. If you would like to subscribe please use the subscribe link on the menu at the top right. You can also share this with your friends by using the social links below. Cheers.

Leave a Reply